|
|
|
RECONCILIATION
OUR GREATEST CHALLENGE- OUR ONLY
HOPE
Jimmy St. Peter
The
book Reconciliation: Our Greatest Challenge-Our Only Hope, by
Curtiss Paul DeYoung, is an insider’s look at the challenges,
realizations, and process toward reconciliation. In chapter one,
the reader is informed about the “dividing walls” that limit our
reconciliation attempts, both in and outside the church. The five
“dividing walls” DeYoung identifies include: isolation,
injustice,
exhaustion, betrayal, and
denial. The author also warns against the
challenges of superiority, more precisely tokenism and assimilation.
Following these “two pillars,” DeYoung explores three feelings
(inferiority, rage, and
fear) that “produce the hostility that is
elicited by attempts to impose superiority” (p.18).
DeYoung asks the reader to consider “Which Jesus is the Real Jesus?”
in order to discover the barriers that hinder reconciliation. DeYoung touches on the dichotomies within the Church’s portrayal of
Jesus. The reader is faced with many opposites: for example, “the
rich Jesus or the poor Jesus,” and “the Protestant Jesus or the
Catholic Jesus?” According to the author, these questions about
Jesus “get to the heart of the issue: our lack of reconciliation”
or our inability to see both sides which limits the path
toward reconciliation (p. 38).
In
chapter four, we again focus on Jesus, his thoughts as well as his
teaching on reconciliation. Throughout chapters five and six, the
author proposes a path toward reconciliation. DeYoung helps the
reader understand the mindset needed to make reconciliation a
reality. Following these two chapters, the remaining chapters provide insights to the processes of reconciliation. In the
epilogue we read that
the time for reconciliation is now;
however, we should be prepared for a “life-long journey.”
Throughout the book I was impressed
with the stories DeYoung used to help the reader understand his
message for a particular situation or chapter. My favorite story, in
chapter three, describes Sojourner Truth’s dispute “with some
clergymen,” concerning the equality of women
(p. 31). The clergymen
were saying that God didn’t show the equality of women through the
birth and death of Jesus. Truth responded with the question, “Where
did your Christ come from?” The clergymen had no response so she
said, “From God and a women! Man had nothing to do with it.” This
was humorous, but at the same time very true!
The book helped open my eyes to the fact that problems in society
cannot be resolved by just addressing them then avoiding them. The book did not deal
only with
racism. It dealt with many social problems including sexism, classism, and other barriers including hatred, prejudice, etc. I
found the “holistic mind-set” for reconciliation most intriguing;
one must realize that each of these areas are vital to a ministry of
reconciliation. Without including all voices in the dialogue as
part of the process of reconciliation, we undermine viable
resolutions to the problem. The fact that both sides of an issue are
needed for resolution is central to the true path of reconciliation.
Any movement toward a resolution would be impossible without both
sides working together to produce a solution to the problem.
DeYoung is right! The time for reconciliation has come,
and as Christians, we should live a life that embodies this process.
Jesus is a model for reconciliation, as he is for love. I believe
that without love, reconciliation is impossible, and vice versa. As
followers of Jesus Christ, we are called to live a life of
reconciliation and love. Reconciliation may be a “life-long
journey,” but now is the time to start! |